Roy Taub is a partner in the Litigation practice group at Greenspoon Marder LLP. Mr. Taub practices commercial litigation, with experience in class actions, antitrust, real estate, sports and entertainment law, and intellectual property litigation. He has represented a diverse mix of clients in all stages of litigation, beginning with motion practice and through discovery, trial, and appeal, in state and federal courts and arbitration proceedings.

Mr. Taub has represented the largest health care company and several of its affiliates in numerous disputes, a telecommunications company in a lawsuit filed to identify and then prosecute claims against the parties responsible for disrupting a high-profile online event, multiple timeshare companies in various matters (including obtaining dismissal of a novel antitrust claim with prejudice), a leading international waste management company in an antitrust class action alleging attempted monopolization of the Long Island commercial waste hauling market, and represented the National Football League (NFL) Players Association and NFL Players Inc., in a class action over the commercial licensing of retired professional football players' intellectual property.

Additionally, he has represented one of the world's leading producers of titanium chemicals, an issuer of student loan-backed auction rate notes, a foreign state in a lawsuit over an unconsummated real estate transaction, a number of real estate developers and investment firms, life sciences companies, and one of the country's largest supermarket chains.

Prior to joining Greenspoon Marder, Mr. Taub practiced in New York with two international law firms.

Bar Admissions

• Florida
• New York

Education

• J.D., Columbia Law School, Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, 2004 Harlan Fiske Stone Moot Court Competition, Director
• Harlan Fiske Stone Moot Court Competition, Director
• B. A., University of Miami, summa cum laude, 2001

• Another Court Concludes that Text Messages Count as "Telephone Calls"
• Fourth Circuit Makes Rare Ruling in TCPA Case That Marketing Partners Can Enforce Website Clauses
• Greenspoon Marder Secures Fourth Circuit Reversal in Sessoms v. USHEALTH Advisors
• TCPA Section 227(c) After Irvin v. Sonic: Why Texts Are Not "Telephone Calls"
• When Are Texts "Calls"? A New TCPA Ruling Says: Right Now
• Does the TCPA Cover Text Messages? A Side-by-Side Look at Two Recent Decisions
• TCPA Update: No Writing Required for "Prior Express Consent"
• TCPA Defense Update: Fake Consent Numbers Defeat Willfulness Claims
• Fifth Circuit Rejects FCC's "Written Consent" Requirement for Prerecorded Calls, Finding No Such Requirement in Text of the TCPA
• Federal Court Says TCPA's Do-Not-Call Provision Does Not Cover Texts
• When Is a Text a Call? A New Ruling Deepens the TCPA Divide
• Are Text Messages "Telephone Calls" Under the TCPA? Radvansky v. Kendo Holdings Breaks It Down
• Astro Companies LLC v. WestFax Inc.: Court Confirms TCPA Does Not Cover Faxes Sent to Online Fax Service
• When Cellular Users Count as "Residential Telephone Subscribers": Key Takeaways from the Showers Decision
• Northern District of Texas Denies Class Certification in TCPA "Do-Not-Call" Case for Numerous Shortcomings Based on Greenspoon Marder's Arguments
• "You Had Me at Hello"-Not at Playback: Ninth Circuit Limits TCPA Prerecorded Voice Claim to Call Initiation
• FTC Biennial Report Highlights Continued Telemarketing Enforcement and Consumer Complaints
• FCC Extends Waiver on Revocation of Consent Rules, Delaying Broad Applicability Until 2027
• The TCPA's Do-Not-Call Rules, Cell Phones, and Texts: Why Courts Still Disagree-and What It Means for Businesses and Consumers
• The Wheel Lands on 'Call': SDNY Rules Marketing Texts Count Under TCPA
• Another Court Says Texts Are Calls Under TCPA Do-Not-Call Rules, Adding to the Nationwide Split
• Is a Text Message a "Telephone Call" Under the TCPA? A New Florida Federal Court Decision Deepens the Split
• Same Fax, But Different Facts - Attempt to Certify Class Didn't Go Through
• Why TCPA Compliance Matters More Than Ever
• McLaughlin v. McKesson: What the Supreme Court's TCPA Ruling Means Now
• Florida Enacts Significant Changes to State's Telephone Solicitation Act
• Client Alert: Warning: This Is Not An April Fool's Joke-Scotus Says That To Be An "ATDS" Under The Telephone Consumer Protection Act There Must Be Capacity To Use A Random Or Sequential Number Generator