Mr. Dong Su SHIN is an attorney at D&A LLC. His practice is primarily focused on the Serious Accidents Punishment Act, Criminal Defense Litigation, General Civil Disputes, and Labor & Employment.

Mr. Shin previously served as an HR manager at Hyundai Steel. After being admitted to Bar, he has since handled a number of civil and criminal cases, as well as provided corporate advisory services.

Bar Admissions

• Admitted to Bar, Korea (2020)

Education

• Yonsei University Law School SAPA Program (2023)
• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Law School (JD, 2019)
• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (BA in Law, 2014)
• Myung Duk Foreign Language High School (2006)

Significant Accomplishments

• D&A LLC (2022-Present)
• YK Law (2021-2022)
• HMP Law (2020-2021)
• Hyundai Steel Dangjin Integrated Steelworks (2014-2016)

Professional Activities and Experience

• Represented City S in an investigation involving a serious civic accident
• Represented corporate clients, including public enterprises, in investigations involving serious industrial accidents
• Provided consulting services to major public enterprises on serious accidents
• Represented a public enterprise Company S in an investigation involving occupational embezzlement by an employee
• Represented a public enterprise Company D in a civil case involving a claim for expenses for repairing defects
• Provided corporate advisory services to a number of clients, including for Company S

• Wrote the section “bond” in the Interpretation of the Civil Act (Articles 564 to 567 of the Civil Act)
• Wrote on the interpretation of the provision of automatic termination added to the provisions of added payment for non-performance in real estate sales contracts (Issues of Civil Litigation Vol. 9)
• Wrote on registration consistent with substantive relationship (43rd edition of Court Data)
• Wrote on the meaning of the phrase “a public official who, by taking advantage of his or her post” in Article 132 (Acceptance of Bribe through Good Offices) under the Criminal Act (Supreme Court Case Explanation Vol. 14)
• Wrote on the legitimacy of written appeal that does not have the prescribed form under Article 19 of the Administrative Appeals Act (Supreme Court Case Explanation No. 14)